Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:40

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
More than 1 million empty seats for Club World Cup group stage. Knockout rounds up next - AP News
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s your idea of the perfect Saturday night?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Which genre of novels is most profitable to publish and why?
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
'Mountainhead' Is Most-Watched HBO Original Film Since 'Bad Education' - Deadline
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
I want to have anal sex, but my wife refuses. What do I do?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
News & Notes: John Harbaugh on Why Jon Gruden Observed OTAs - Baltimore Ravens